AMD FirePro M3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M3900 and NVIDIA GeForce G210M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M3900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 160 vs 16
- 5x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 48 gflops
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4446 vs 2881
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 October 2010 vs 15 June 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 48 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4446 vs 2881 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210M
- 2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 20 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M3900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G210M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro M3900 | NVIDIA GeForce G210M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4446 | 2881 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 128 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 19 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1294 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1294 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro M3900 | NVIDIA GeForce G210M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Seymour | GT218 |
| Launch date | 19 October 2010 | 15 June 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1661 | 1664 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 48 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Gigaflops | 72 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | n / a | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Form factor | chip-down | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
