AMD FirePro M4000 vs AMD FirePro V4900

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4000 and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1604 vs 988
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 309
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.659 vs 6.303
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 424.37 vs 392.237
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.67 vs 0.597
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.072 vs 17.874
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 79.304 vs 72.818
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2189 vs 1747
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2189 vs 1747

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 675 MHz
• Around 11% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12641 vs 5495
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 3539
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3357
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 3539
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1604 988
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	412 309
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5495 12641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.659 6.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	424.37 392.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.67 0.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.072 17.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.304 72.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2189 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3539 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 7745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2189 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3539 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 7745

Compare specifications (specs)