AMD FirePro M4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 96
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 69 Watt
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1593 vs 738
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2012 vs 2 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1593 vs 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 vs 242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11231 vs 5532
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3974 vs 3357
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3974 vs 3357
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11231 vs 5532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1593 | 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | 242 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 11231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.659 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 424.37 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.072 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 79.304 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2189 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2189 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3974 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Chelsea | GT215 |
Launch date | 27 June 2012 | 2 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 950 | 952 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 27.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |