AMD FirePro M4100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4100 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 670 MHz vs 601 MHz
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 vs 355
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.162 vs 68.712
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 7 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 670 MHz vs 601 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 vs 355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 vs 68.712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 67.31 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 1,615 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2779 vs 1059
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5107 vs 5067
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.713 vs 15.905
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 685.1 vs 432.116
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.189 vs 1.48
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.929 vs 24.029
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3591
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3591
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 67.31 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,615 gflops vs 514.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2779 vs 1059 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5107 vs 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.713 vs 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 685.1 vs 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.189 vs 1.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.929 vs 24.029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3591 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M4100 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1059 | 2779 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 | 355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5067 | 5107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.905 | 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 432.116 | 685.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.48 | 2.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.029 | 28.929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 | 68.712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3591 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3591 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4825 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M4100 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Mars | GK104 |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 7 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 803 | 805 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329.99 | |
Price now | $391 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 601 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 16.08 GTexel / s | 67.31 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration |