AMD Radeon RX 640 vs AMD FirePro M4100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and AMD FirePro M4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 670 MHz
- 2424.1x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 16.08 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11518 vs 5067
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2099 vs 1059
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 16 October 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 670 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 16.08 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11518 vs 5067 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2099 vs 1059 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3591 vs 1769
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3591 vs 1769
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2775
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2775
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 vs 350
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3591 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3591 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 2775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 2775 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 vs 350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD FirePro M4100 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11518 | 5067 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 | 623 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2099 | 1059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 432.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.48 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.029 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD FirePro M4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Arctic Islands | Mars |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 16 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 804 | 807 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 670 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 16.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
AppAcceleration |