AMD FirePro M4150 vs AMD FirePro V5900
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4150 and AMD FirePro V5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 715 MHz vs 600 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3412 vs 2880
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1713
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1713
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2181 vs 2091
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2181 vs 2091
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 24 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3412 vs 2880 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 vs 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 vs 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 vs 2091 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 vs 2091 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 614.4 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1265 vs 949
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 173
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 3354
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 3354
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 614.4 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1265 vs 949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 vs 173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5078 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5078 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4150
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V5900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD FirePro V5900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 949 | 1265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 | 355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3412 | 2880 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 | 2091 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 | 2091 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 5078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 5078 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.167 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 409.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.772 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.259 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M4150 | AMD FirePro V5900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Opal | Cayman |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 24 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1097 | 1098 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 614.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,640 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 230 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |