AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs AMD FirePro M4150
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and AMD FirePro M4150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 715 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1616 vs 949
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 173
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 3412
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 1764
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 1764
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 vs 16 October 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1616 vs 949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 173 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 vs 3412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 vs 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 vs 1764 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2181 vs 1228
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1705
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2181 vs 1228
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1705
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 vs 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 1705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 vs 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 1705 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4150
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | AMD FirePro M4150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1616 | 949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 173 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 | 3412 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 | 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1705 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 | 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1705 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M275X | AMD FirePro M4150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Venus | Opal |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 | 16 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1096 | 1097 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 715 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 17.16 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |