AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,627 gflops
- Around 72% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 8799
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 24.487
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 vs 600.985
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 2.281
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 35.452
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 61.984
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 1105
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 1105
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,627 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 vs 8799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 vs 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 vs 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 vs 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 vs 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 vs 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 vs 1105 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2772 vs 2314
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 290
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 1803
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3246 vs 2517
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 1803
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3246 vs 2517
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2772 vs 2314 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 vs 290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 vs 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 vs 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 vs 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 vs 2517 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2314 | 2772 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 290 | 325 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 | 8799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 3246 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Saturn | GK104 |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 863 | 1086 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 67.78 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |