AMD FirePro M6100 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M6100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 52% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1075 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,651 gflops versus 1,627 gflops
- Environ 72% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 3200 MHz
- 5.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 versus 9097
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 versus 24.487
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.731 versus 600.985
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 versus 2.281
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 versus 35.452
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 versus 61.984
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 versus 1105
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 versus 1105
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1075 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,651 gflops versus 1,627 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 3200 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 versus 9097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 versus 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 versus 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 versus 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 versus 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 versus 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 versus 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 versus 1105 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 67.78 GTexel / s versus 51.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1152 versus 768
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2736 versus 2123
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 versus 303
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 versus 1803
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3246 versus 2517
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 versus 1803
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3246 versus 2517
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.78 GTexel / s versus 51.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 768 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2736 versus 2123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 versus 303 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 versus 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 versus 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 versus 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 versus 2517 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2123 | 2736 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 324 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 | 9097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.059 | 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 750.731 | 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.395 | 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.283 | 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.915 | 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4537 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4537 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 3246 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro M6100 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Saturn | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 854 | 1075 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1075 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,651 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1152 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.6 GTexel / s | 67.78 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | large | large |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 88 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |