AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M8900 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M8900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 960 vs 480
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 12.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18738 vs 1550
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.529 vs 4.278
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 760.858 vs 255.525
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.158 vs 0.464
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.149 vs 13.633
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.525 vs 59.183
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 April 2011 vs 7 February 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops vs 624.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18738 vs 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.529 vs 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 760.858 vs 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.158 vs 0.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.149 vs 13.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.525 vs 59.183 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M8900
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M8900 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18738 | 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.529 | 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 760.858 | 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.158 | 0.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.149 | 13.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.525 | 59.183 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 550 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M8900 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Blackcomb | Thames |
Launch date | 12 April 2011 | 7 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1431 | 1432 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,700 million | 716 million |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | n / a | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 115 GB / s | 28.8 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |