AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S10000 Passive and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 732 MHz
  • 12.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 164.0 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2688
  • Around 73% better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 3,935 gflops
Core clock speed 825 MHz vs 732 MHz
Texture fill rate 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 164.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3584 vs 2688
Floating-point performance 2x 3,405 gflops vs 3,935 gflops

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

  • 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 750 Watt
  • Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 235 Watt vs 750 Watt
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz vs 5000 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Name AMD FirePro S10000 Passive NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
PassMark - G3D Mark 2918
PassMark - G2D Mark 172
Geekbench - OpenCL 17075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 49.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1666.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 92.472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 275.229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7038

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Tahiti GK110
Launch date 12 November 2012 12 November 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $3,599 $7,699
Place in performance rating not rated 805
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz
Core clock speed 825 MHz 732 MHz
Floating-point performance 2x 3,405 gflops 3,935 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 3584 2688
Texture fill rate 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec 164.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 750 Watt 235 Watt
Transistor count 4,313 million 7,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort No outputs
Dual-link DVI support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 305 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 480 GB / s 249.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 2x 384 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 5200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare AMD FirePro S10000 Passive with others

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive AMD
FirePro S10000 Passive
vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm NVIDIA
Tesla K20Xm
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive AMD
FirePro S10000 Passive
vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X NVIDIA
Tesla K20X
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive AMD
FirePro S10000 Passive
vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c NVIDIA
Tesla K20c