AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S10000 Passive and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 732 MHz
- 12.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 164.0 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2688
- Around 73% better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 3,935 gflops
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 732 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 164.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2688 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops vs 3,935 gflops |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 750 Watt
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Name | AMD FirePro S10000 Passive | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | GK110 |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 | 12 November 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | $7,699 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 804 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 732 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2688 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 164.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 750 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |