AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD FirePro W8000
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S10000 and AMD FirePro W8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 20.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1792
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4768 vs 4164
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30631 vs 24518
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.836 vs 64.628
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7867 vs 7400
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7867 vs 7400
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 vs 14 June 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops vs 3,226 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4768 vs 4164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30631 vs 24518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.836 vs 64.628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7867 vs 7400 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7867 vs 7400 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8000
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 750 Watt
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 528 vs 502
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3621
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3321
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3621
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3321
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 528 vs 502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3321 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S10000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S10000 | AMD FirePro W8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4768 | 4164 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 | 528 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30631 | 24518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.836 | 64.628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.978 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7867 | 7400 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3621 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7867 | 7400 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3621 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S10000 | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | Tahiti |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 | 14 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 443 | 441 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 750 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | Full Height / Full Length |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm | 279 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB / s | 176 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |