AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD FirePro S10000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270X and AMD FirePro S10000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon R9 270X

AMD FirePro S10000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 950 MHz
4.2x lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 750 Watt
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4869 vs 4768
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 vs 502
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8068 vs 7867
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 3621
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3321
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8068 vs 7867
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 3621
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3321

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 October 2013 vs 12 November 2012
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 950 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	180 Watt vs 750 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4869 vs 4768
PassMark - G2D Mark	613 vs 502
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8068 vs 7867
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3706 vs 3621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8068 vs 7867
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3706 vs 3621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3321

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000

25.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1280
2.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.836 vs 63.87
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.978 vs 6.354

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4096 vs 1280
Floating-point performance	2x 3,405 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	73.836 vs 63.87
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.978 vs 6.354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4869

4768

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

613

502

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

63.87

73.836

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.354

6.978

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8068

7867

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3706

3621

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3321

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8068

7867

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3706

3621

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3321

Name	AMD Radeon R9 270X	AMD FirePro S10000
PassMark - G3D Mark	4869	4768
PassMark - G2D Mark	613	502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	63.87	73.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1314.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.354	6.978
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	85.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	315.412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8068	7867
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3706	3621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8068	7867
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3706	3621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1772
Geekbench - OpenCL		30631

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 270X	AMD FirePro S10000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Curacao	Tahiti
Design	AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch date	8 October 2013	12 November 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$3,599
Place in performance rating	440	443
Price now	$399
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	16.05
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	950 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,688 gflops	2x 3,405 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1280	4096
Stream Processors	1280
Texture fill rate	84 GTexel / s	2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	180 Watt	750 Watt
Transistor count	2,800 million	4,313 million
Core clock speed		825 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2 x 6-pin	2x 8-pin
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		305 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	480 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	2x 384 Bit
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Memory clock speed		5000 MHz
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)