Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD FirePro S4000X
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD FirePro S4000X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 812.9x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 31 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 9x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 7 August 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s vs 31 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S4000X
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 992.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.089 vs 18.422
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 478.725 vs 221.42
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.08 vs 1.26
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.934 vs 12.354
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 92.567 vs 19.644
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 vs 18.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 vs 221.42 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 vs 1.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 vs 12.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 vs 19.644 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S4000X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | AMD FirePro S4000X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 723 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 178 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3236 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.422 | 19.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 | 478.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.26 | 2.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.354 | 34.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.644 | 92.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 615 | AMD FirePro S4000X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Venus |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 7 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1417 | 1420 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 615 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7200 GS
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 285
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1600M
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620M
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
