AMD FirePro S7100X vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7100X and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7100X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.888 vs 49.455
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.677 vs 275.229
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 May 2016 vs 12 November 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.888 vs 49.455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.677 vs 275.229 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 31% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 2048
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 1283.973
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 5.781
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 70.708
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 vs 1283.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 vs 5.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 vs 70.708 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7100X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S7100X | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.888 | 49.455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1283.973 | 1666.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.781 | 5.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.708 | 92.472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.677 | 275.229 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4403 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S7100X | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Amethyst | GK110 |
Launch date | 25 May 2016 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 744 | 746 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 732 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2688 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |