AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7150 and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3770 vs 3032
• Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27146 vs 14269
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6147 vs 4468
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3667
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6147 vs 4468
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3667

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

• Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 414
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.283 vs 27.544
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 815.354 vs 570.969
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.437 vs 0.687
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.718 vs 23.637
• 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 583
• 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 583

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3770 3032
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	414 460
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	27146 14269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.544 39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	570.969 815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.687 3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.637 63.718
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6147 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4359 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	583 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6147 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4359 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	583 3340

Compare specifications (specs)