AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7150 and AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 834 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 2,989 gflops
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29623 vs 23585
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 834 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s vs 93.41 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops vs 2,989 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29623 vs 23585 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 5460 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5024 vs 2727
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 745 vs 465
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.272 vs 27.544
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 778.867 vs 570.969
- 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.051 vs 0.687
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.535 vs 23.637
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 5460 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5024 vs 2727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 745 vs 465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.272 vs 27.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 778.867 vs 570.969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.051 vs 0.687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.535 vs 23.637 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2727 | 5024 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29623 | 23585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | 56.272 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | 778.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | 5.051 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 | 65.535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Grenada |
Launch date | 1 February 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
Place in performance rating | 634 | 422 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 834 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 2,989 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s | 93.41 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 174.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5460 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore |