AMD FirePro S9050 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S9050 and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD FirePro S9050

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 600 MHz
21x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
22.4x more pipelines: 1792 vs 80
33.6x better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 96 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
24x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 512 MB
4.6x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
96.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4901 vs 51

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 August 2014 vs 1 January 2009
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 vs 80
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops vs 96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4901 vs 51

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

7x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 369

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	32 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	482 vs 369

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro S9050
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

369

482

Name	AMD FirePro S9050	ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
PassMark - G3D Mark	4901	51
PassMark - G2D Mark	369	482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	68.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1463.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	91.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	344.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	13032
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	13032

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro S9050	ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale
Code name	Tahiti	RV620
Launch date	7 August 2014	1 January 2009
Place in performance rating	362	322
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	900 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	1792	80
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel / s	4.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	32 Watt
Transistor count	4,313 million	181 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x VHDCI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Form factor	Full Height / Full Length
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	254 mm	170 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	10.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	264 GB / s	38.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3