NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S9050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 900 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7873 vs 4901
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 369
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.146 vs 68.324
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 6.491
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.209 vs 91.133
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 570.245 vs 344.551
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 7062
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 7062

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050

• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1463.376 vs 1315.075
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3715
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3358
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3715
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7873 4901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	572 369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.146 68.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1315.075 1463.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 6.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	93.209 91.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	570.245 344.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 13032
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 13032

Compare specifications (specs)