AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs AMD FirePro S9050

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 1238.1x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6832 vs 4901
• Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 369
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.82 vs 68.324
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 1463.376
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 6.491
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 91.133
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 344.551
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9175 vs 7062
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9175 vs 7062

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050

• Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3670
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3353
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3670
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6832 4901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	673 369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	105.82 68.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860.146 1463.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.238 6.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.947 91.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	596.819 344.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 13032
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 13032

Compare specifications (specs)