NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro S9050
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8878 vs 7062
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8878 vs 7062
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 439 vs 369
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6722 vs 4901
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 7 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 vs 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 vs 7062 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 439 vs 369 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6722 vs 4901 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3716
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3716
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3359
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD FirePro S9050 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 13032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 13032 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 439 | 369 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6722 | 4901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33704 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q1 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 371 | 373 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort |