AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S9300 X2 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9300 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 40.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 217.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 55.2 GTexel / s
- 170.7x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 48
- 15.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 6,963 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27971 vs 4536
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 March 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 217.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 55.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 6,963 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27971 vs 4536 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 20x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 300 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S9300 X2
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S9300 X2 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27971 | 4536 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1530 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Capsaicin | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 31 March 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
Place in performance rating | 805 | 808 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 6,963 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 217.6 GTexel / s billion / sec | 55.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 512.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 4096 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | HBM | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |