AMD FirePro W4190M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4190M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s
- Around 57% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 440.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1156 vs 525
- 19.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 vs 1186
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2529 vs 1684
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 3070
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2529 vs 1684
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 3070
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 23 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 440.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1156 vs 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 vs 1186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2529 vs 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 vs 3070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2529 vs 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 vs 3070 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 247 vs 178
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 vs 178 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4190M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W4190M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1156 | 525 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 178 | 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 | 1186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 284.018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.417 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2529 | 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 | 3070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2529 | 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 | 3070 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W4190M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Opal | Pinewood |
| Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 23 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1074 | 1077 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 440.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 11 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 627 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W4190M with others
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440-SE
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
AMDRadeon R7 250E
AMDFirePro W4190M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 7
