AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon R7 250E

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4190M and AMD Radeon R7 250E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD Radeon R7 250E

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 800 MHz
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 3355
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 3355

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 November 2015 vs 20 December 2013
Core clock speed	825 MHz vs 800 MHz
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3889 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3889 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E

Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
Around 19% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 vs 284.018
Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.2 vs 1.417
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 vs 1704
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2529
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 vs 1704
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2529

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	25.6 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Floating-point performance	819.2 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	582.073 vs 284.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.2 vs 1.417
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2873 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 2529
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2873 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 2529

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4190M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250E

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

284.018

582.073

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.417

2.2

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1704

2873

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2529

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3889

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1704

2873

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2529

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3889

3355

Name	AMD FirePro W4190M	AMD Radeon R7 250E
PassMark - G3D Mark	1148
PassMark - G2D Mark	180
Geekbench - OpenCL	23384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	284.018	582.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.417	2.2
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1704	2873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2529	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3889	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1704	2873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2529	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3889	3355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		21.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		98.052
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro W4190M	AMD Radeon R7 250E
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Opal	Cape Verde
Launch date	12 November 2015	20 December 2013
Place in performance rating	1066	1067
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$109
Technical info
Boost clock speed	900 MHz
Core clock speed	825 MHz	800 MHz
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	819.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	512
Texture fill rate	21.6 GTexel / s	25.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	1,500 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		55 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		168 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	72 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	4500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
AppAcceleration
Enduro
Powerplay