AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R9 370
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4300 and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3718
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3357
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3718
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3357
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- Around 75% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 2818
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 659
- 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 10312
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.576 vs 31.528
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.491 vs 152.484
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6096 vs 3572
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6096 vs 3572
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 1,428 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 vs 2818 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 659 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 vs 10312 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 vs 31.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 vs 152.484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 vs 3572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 vs 3572 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4300
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4300 | AMD Radeon R9 370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2818 | 4722 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 781 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10312 | 75346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.528 | 64.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.985 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.153 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 152.484 | 336.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3572 | 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3572 | 6096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W4300 | AMD Radeon R9 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Bonaire | Trinidad |
Launch date | 1 December 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 416 | 404 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 925 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 GTexel / s | 78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,800 million |
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 171 mm | 221 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 179.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |