AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R9 370

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4300 and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 1% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 110 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3718
  • 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3357
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3718
  • 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 December 2015 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed 930 MHz vs 925 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 110 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6161 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 17597 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6161 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 17597 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370

  • Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
  • Around 75% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 2818
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 659
  • 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 10312
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.576 vs 31.528
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.491 vs 152.484
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6096 vs 3572
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6096 vs 3572
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 768
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4722 vs 2818
PassMark - G2D Mark 781 vs 659
Geekbench - OpenCL 75346 vs 10312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 64.576 vs 31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 336.491 vs 152.484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6096 vs 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6096 vs 3572

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4300
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2818
4722
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
659
781
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10312
75346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.528
64.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
152.484
336.491
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3572
6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6161
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17597
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3572
6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6161
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17597
3357
Name AMD FirePro W4300 AMD Radeon R9 370
PassMark - G3D Mark 2818 4722
PassMark - G2D Mark 659 781
Geekbench - OpenCL 10312 75346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.528 64.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 828.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 152.484 336.491
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3572 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6161 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 17597 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3572 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6161 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 17597 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro W4300 AMD Radeon R9 370

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Bonaire Trinidad
Launch date 1 December 2015 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 416 404
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 930 MHz 925 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,428 gflops 2,496 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1280
Texture fill rate 44.64 GTexel / s 78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 110 Watt
Transistor count 2,080 million 2,800 million
Boost clock speed 975 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 171 mm 221 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s 179.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 5600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5