AMD FirePro W5000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- 533.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 570 versus 533
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3686
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3686
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 versus 10 May 2012 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 versus 533 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3686 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 825 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.5 billion / sec versus 39.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 768
- Environ 94% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,267 gflops
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5332 versus 2988
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15502 versus 9969
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 versus 771.327
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 versus 2.758
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 versus 4308
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 versus 4308
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec versus 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,267 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5332 versus 2988 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15502 versus 9969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 versus 771.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 versus 2.758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 versus 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 versus 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro W5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2988 | 5332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 | 533 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9969 | 15502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 771.327 | 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.758 | 4.281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4308 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4308 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro W5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 | 10 May 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 566 | 564 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $474.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,267 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.6 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 183 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 102.4 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro W5000 avec des autres
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
ATIFireMV 2250
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIAP104-100
