AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W7000 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 53.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 40.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4253 vs 104
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 541 vs 320
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 June 2012 vs 9 January 2008 |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4253 vs 104 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 541 vs 320 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
- 14x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 350 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W7000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W7000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4253 | 104 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 541 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.467 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W7000 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
Code name | Pitcairn | MCP79Mx + NB9M |
Launch date | 13 June 2012 | 9 January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Place in performance rating | 508 | 509 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 76 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 242 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 |