NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W7000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD FirePro W7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 950 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5320 vs 4255
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19914 vs 17788
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.188 vs 52.467
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 1148.367
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 4.886
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 268.49
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6475
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6475

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7000

• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 76 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 2,432 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 345
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.472 vs 82.067
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3579
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3579

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5320 4255
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	345 539
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19914 17788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.188 52.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1159.046 1148.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.507 4.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.067 85.472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.638 268.49
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359

Compare specifications (specs)