AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W9000 and ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 2x 800
- 2x better floating-point performance: 3,994 gflops vs 2x 1,000.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1990 MHz
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6138 vs 1132
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 542
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 June 2012 vs 7 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 2x 800 |
Floating-point performance | 3,994 gflops vs 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1990 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 vs 1132 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 542 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 124.8 GTexel / s
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
Texture fill rate | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 124.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W9000
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W9000 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 | 1132 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | 542 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1734.394 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 460.234 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W9000 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tahiti | R700 |
Launch date | 14 June 2012 | 7 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,999 | $420 |
Place in performance rating | 336 | 246 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,994 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel / s | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | 2x 63.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |