AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W9000 and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 602 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 192
- 8.6x better floating-point performance: 3,994 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1536 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6157 vs 947
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 vs 454
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 June 2012 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 3,994 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6157 vs 947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 vs 454 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro CX
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W9000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W9000 | NVIDIA Quadro CX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6157 | 947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | 454 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1734.394 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 460.234 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W9000 | NVIDIA Quadro CX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | GT200B |
Launch date | 14 June 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,999 | $1,999 |
Place in performance rating | 337 | 340 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,994 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |