AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W9000 and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 62% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 602 MHz
  • 3.2x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 192
  • 8.6x better floating-point performance: 3,994 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1536 MB
  • 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6157 vs 947
  • Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 vs 454
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 14 June 2012 vs 11 November 2008
Core clock speed 975 MHz vs 602 MHz
Texture fill rate 124.8 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2048 vs 192
Floating-point performance 3,994 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 1536 MB
Memory clock speed 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6157 vs 947
PassMark - G2D Mark 753 vs 454

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro CX

  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 350 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W9000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6157
947
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
753
454
Name AMD FirePro W9000 NVIDIA Quadro CX
PassMark - G3D Mark 6157 947
PassMark - G2D Mark 753 454
Geekbench - OpenCL 31775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 84.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1734.394
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 86.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 460.234

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro W9000 NVIDIA Quadro CX

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name Tahiti GT200B
Launch date 14 June 2012 11 November 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $3,999 $1,999
Place in performance rating 337 340
Type Workstation Workstation
Price now $149.95
Value for money (0-100) 8.20

Technical info

Core clock speed 975 MHz 602 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,994 gflops 462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 2048 192
Texture fill rate 124.8 GTexel / s 38.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 350 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 4,313 million 1,400 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Dual-link DVI support
StereoOutput3D

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 279 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 264 GB / s 76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5500 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3