NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W9000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile and AMD FirePro W9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 975 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8801 vs 6138
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34289 vs 31775

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000

• Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel / s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 3,994 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 451

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8801 6138
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	451 720
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	34289 31775

Compare specifications (specs)