AMD ROG Ally Extreme vs ATI Mobility Radeon X300
Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally Extreme and ATI Mobility Radeon X300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally Extreme
- Videocard is newer: launch date 17 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 7.7x more boost clock speed: 2700 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 92571.4x more texture fill rate: 129.6 GTexel/s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
- 192x more pipelines: 768 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 110 nm
- 128x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 128 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 vs 1 November 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s vs 1.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally Extreme
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X300
Name | AMD ROG Ally Extreme | ATI Mobility Radeon X300 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2837 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 34 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 204 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD ROG Ally Extreme | ATI Mobility Radeon X300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Phoenix | M22 |
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 | 1 November 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 871 | 870 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz | 350 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 4 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 1.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 25390 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | |
Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0b |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s | 4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 250 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | 64 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PCIe |