AMD ROG Ally vs Intel Arc A570M
Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally and Intel Arc A570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
| Launch date | 2023 vs 1 Aug 2023 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A570M
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 166.4 GTexel/s vs 40.00 GTexel/s
- 8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 256
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective
| Texture fill rate | 166.4 GTexel/s vs 40.00 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 256 |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally
GPU 2: Intel Arc A570M
| Name | AMD ROG Ally | Intel Arc A570M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 58239 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD ROG Ally | Intel Arc A570M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Code name | Phoenix | DG2-256 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 1 Aug 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 354 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Compute units | 4 | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 20.00 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 40.00 GTexel/s | 166.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 25390 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | |
| Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | GDDR6 |
