AMD ROG Ally vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally and NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Launch date | 2023 vs 21 Mar 2023 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 5 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 244.1 GTexel/s vs 40.00 GTexel/s
- 18x more pipelines: 4608 vs 256
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s vs 40.00 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 256 |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
Name | AMD ROG Ally | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 96419 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16044 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD ROG Ally | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | Phoenix | AD106 |
Launch date | 2023 | 21 Mar 2023 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 94 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Compute units | 4 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 5 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.00 GPixel/s | 81.36 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 40.00 GTexel/s | 244.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | 22900 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | |
Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | GDDR6 |