AMD ROG Ally vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally and NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
| Launch date | 2023 vs 21 Mar 2023 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 5 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 244.1 GTexel/s vs 40.00 GTexel/s
- 18x more pipelines: 4608 vs 256
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective
| Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s vs 40.00 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 256 |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
| Name | AMD ROG Ally | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 96838 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15893 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD ROG Ally | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | Phoenix | AD106 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 21 Mar 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 103 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Compute units | 4 | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 20.00 GPixel/s | 81.36 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 40.00 GTexel/s | 244.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 25390 million | 22900 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | |
| Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | GDDR6 |
