AMD ROG Ally vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally and NVIDIA CMP 30HX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1785 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
| Launch date | 2023 vs 25 Feb 2021 |
| Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1785 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 30HX
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 40.00 GTexel/s
- 5.5x more pipelines: 1408 vs 256
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 40.00 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 256 |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally
GPU 2: NVIDIA CMP 30HX
| Name | AMD ROG Ally | NVIDIA CMP 30HX |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67806 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD ROG Ally | NVIDIA CMP 30HX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Phoenix | TU116 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 25 Feb 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 293 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Compute units | 4 | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1408 |
| Pixel fill rate | 20.00 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 40.00 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Transistor count | 25390 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | 35 mm, 1.4 inches |
| Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | 229 mm, 9 inches |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | 111 mm, 4.4 inches |
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | GDDR6 |
