AMD Radeon 530X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 374.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 3 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops vs 374.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- 2x more core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 24.5 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 24.5 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Name | AMD Radeon 530X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28019 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1876 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 530X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Meso | G92 |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 842 | 1256 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1021 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1463 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 374.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 24.5 GTexel / s | 38 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Gigaflops | 562 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-IV |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |