AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 720 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 758 MHz
- 305.2x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 80.6 billion / sec
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2343 vs 1263
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2343 vs 1263
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3111
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3111
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 4 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 758 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 80.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3111 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 784.1 gflops
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 193
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3216 vs 1071
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10001 vs 6339
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops vs 784.1 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 193 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3216 vs 1071 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10001 vs 6339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2409 vs 2405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2409 vs 2405 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 338 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1071 | 3216 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6339 | 10001 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Topaz | GK104 |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 4 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 992 | 1049 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $310.50 | |
Price now | $499.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 758 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 720 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 80.6 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 834 M | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI | ||
TXAA |