AMD Radeon 540X Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 540X Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 540X Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 358.5x more texture fill rate: 39.00 GTexel/s vs 108.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5448 MHz
- 29.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1349 vs 46
- 26.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 125.7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 23 November 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.00 GTexel/s vs 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5448 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1349 vs 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 125.7 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
- 4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 512
- 2785.6x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 1.25 TFLOPs
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2852 vs 1349
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7037 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 1.25 TFLOPs |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2852 vs 1349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540X Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 540X Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3100 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3100 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1349 | 2852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1349 | 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 7037 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 125.7 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8335 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 278 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1438 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 540X Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | Amethyst |
| Design | Radeon 500X Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 23 November 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 937 | 938 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1.25 TFLOPs | 3,482 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 9.80 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 39.00 GTexel/s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 174.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5448 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 540X Mobile with others
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5200
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4800
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
