AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD FirePro W4100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD FirePro W4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 630 MHz
- 1219.2x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1951
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1951
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 13 August 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 630 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 20.16 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1951 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 694
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 vs 694
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1620 vs 1116
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1620 vs 1116
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 481 vs 205
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1529 vs 897
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3399 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3399 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1620 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1620 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 vs 205 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1529 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 3399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 1620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 1620 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 481 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 1529 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.65 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.63 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.309 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | AMD FirePro W4100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 13 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 954 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 630 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 20.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 645.1 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
| Length | 171 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
