AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD FirePro W4100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD FirePro W4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 630 MHz
  • 1219.2x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1975
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1975
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 13 August 2014
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 630 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991 vs 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991 vs 1975

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
  • 4.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
  • 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 694
  • 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 vs 694
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1620 vs 1116
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1620 vs 1116
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 520 vs 233
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1507 vs 944
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 512 vs 384
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3399 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3399 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1620 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1620 vs 1116
PassMark - G2D Mark 520 vs 233
PassMark - G3D Mark 1507 vs 944

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
1975
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
1975
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
1620
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
1620
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
233
520
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
944
1507
Name AMD Radeon 620 AMD FirePro W4100
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116 1620
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116 1620
PassMark - G2D Mark 233 520
PassMark - G3D Mark 944 1507
Geekbench - OpenCL 6531
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 538.098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 75.244

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 AMD FirePro W4100

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Polaris 24 Cape Verde
Launch date 13 May 2019 13 August 2014
Place in performance rating 1111 769
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 630 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 512
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 20.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million 1,500 million
Floating-point performance 645.1 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Low Profile / Half Length
Length 171 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 4000 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AppAcceleration
Powerplay