AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 1031.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 172
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 28 June 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 172 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 1991
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 1991
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 694
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1116
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 vs 934
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1116 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 vs 934 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 172 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 934 | 1516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Polaris 24 | GM108 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 28 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1247 | 1071 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 993 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 954 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |