AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 993 MHz
  • 1031.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 172
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 28 June 2016
Boost clock speed 1024 MHz vs 993 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 vs 172

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

  • Around 31% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 5.6x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 1991
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 1991
  • 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 694
  • 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 694
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1116
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1116
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 vs 934
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 730 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2486 vs 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2486 vs 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3587 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3587 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 1116
PassMark - G3D Mark 1516 vs 934

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
2486
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
2486
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3587
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3587
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3357
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
205
172
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
934
1516
Name AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991 2486
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991 2486
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694 3587
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694 3587
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116 3357
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 172
PassMark - G3D Mark 934 1516
Geekbench - OpenCL 6325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 312.94
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 103.937
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 585

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Maxwell
Code name Polaris 24 GM108
Launch date 13 May 2019 28 June 2016
Place in performance rating 1247 1071
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz 993 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 954 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 384
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 23.83 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 23 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million 1,870 million
Floating-point performance 762.6 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 40.1 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 5012 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus