AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon R5 M315
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon R5 M315 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 1055.8x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1074 vs 478
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 208 vs 143
- Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6501 vs 3573
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 780
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 2761
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 780
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 2761
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1074 vs 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 vs 143 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 vs 3573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 2761 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 2761 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Core clock speed | 970 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M315
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R5 M315 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1074 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 143 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | 3573 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 2761 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 2761 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R5 M315 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | Meso |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1143 | 1156 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | 5 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 970 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 23.28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Floating-point performance | 745.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |