AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon R5 M315

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon R5 M315 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 1055.8x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1074 vs 478
  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 208 vs 143
  • Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6501 vs 3573
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 780
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 2761
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 780
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 2761
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 320
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1074 vs 478
PassMark - G2D Mark 208 vs 143
Geekbench - OpenCL 6501 vs 3573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2032 vs 780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2920 vs 2761
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2032 vs 780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2920 vs 2761

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315

  • Around 33% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Core clock speed 970 MHz vs 730 MHz
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M315

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1074
478
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
208
143
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6501
3573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2032
780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2920
2761
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2032
780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2920
2761
Name AMD Radeon 625 AMD Radeon R5 M315
PassMark - G3D Mark 1074 478
PassMark - G2D Mark 208 143
Geekbench - OpenCL 6501 3573
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 322.556
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 70.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2032 780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2920 2761
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3215
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2032 780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2920 2761
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3215

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 625 AMD Radeon R5 M315

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 3.0
Code name Polaris 24 Meso
Launch date 13 May 2019 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 1143 1156
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6 5
Core clock speed 730 MHz 970 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 320
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 23.28 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt
Floating-point performance 745.0 gflops
Transistor count 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.0 Not Listed
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1000 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore