AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 7750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 960.2x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 305
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 1439
- 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 305
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 1439
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 15 February 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 1439 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 vs 1074
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 208
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 vs 18.876
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 vs 322.556
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 vs 1.478
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 32.22
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 vs 70.423
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3295 vs 3215
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3295 vs 3215
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 vs 1074 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 vs 208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 vs 18.876 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 vs 322.556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 vs 1.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 vs 32.22 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 vs 70.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 vs 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 vs 3215 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1074 | 1691 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 426 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3295 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 15 February 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1143 | 1147 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $149.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 625 with others
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 7000
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M365X
AMDRadeon 625 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640
AMDRadeon 625 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
