AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 vs 176.928
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 27.603

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1024 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1074
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 208
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 18.876
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.478
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 70.423
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 2032
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2920
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3215
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 2032
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2920
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1074 1894
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	208 355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.876 26.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	322.556 176.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.478 1.666
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.22 27.603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.423 135.437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 2408
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 2408
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3352

Compare specifications (specs)