AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon 625

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 38% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 530 MHz
1536.3x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 16 billion / sec
6x more pipelines: 384 vs 64
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1074 vs 534
4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 208 vs 50
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 2414
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 2414

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 1 November 2008
Core clock speed	730 MHz vs 530 MHz
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 16 billion / sec
Pipelines	384 vs 64
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 60 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1074 vs 534
PassMark - G2D Mark	208 vs 50
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3215 vs 2414
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3215 vs 2414

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)

Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1074

534

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

208

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

2414

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

2414

Name	AMD Radeon 625	NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark	1074	534
PassMark - G2D Mark	208	50
Geekbench - OpenCL	6501
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	322.556
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2920
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3215	2414
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2920
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3215	2414

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 625	NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Tesla
Code name	Polaris 24	G94
Launch date	13 May 2019	1 November 2008
Place in performance rating	1122	1484
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	64
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	16 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt
CUDA cores		64
Floating-point performance		169.6 gflops
Gigaflops		254
Transistor count		505 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	10.0
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s	51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
Power management		8.0