AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 991.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 6139
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 27.096
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 1813
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 1813

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 730 MHz
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2145 vs 1085
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 vs 209
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 vs 18.876
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 322.556
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 vs 1.478
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 70.423
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 2032
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3215
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 2032
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1085 2145
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 474
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6656 6139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.876 24.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	322.556 335.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.478 1.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.22 27.096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.423 97.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3309

Compare specifications (specs)