AMD Radeon 625 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 625
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.58 GTexel/s versus 24.79 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 55 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 versus 6139
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 versus 27.096
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 versus 1813
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 versus 1813
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s versus 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 versus 6139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 versus 27.096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 versus 1813 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 730 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2145 versus 1077
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 versus 209
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 versus 18.876
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 versus 322.556
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 versus 1.478
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 70.423
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 2032
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 3215
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 2032
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 3215
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 730 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2145 versus 1077 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 versus 209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 versus 18.876 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 versus 322.556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 versus 1.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 70.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 versus 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 versus 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 3215 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | 2145 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 474 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 6139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 27.096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 97.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Polaris 24 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1134 | 994 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.40 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon 625 avec des autres
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
