AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon 625

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
979.3x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.1 billion / sec
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 106 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 4923
Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 14.758
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 vs 302.509
Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 vs 0.965
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 14.925
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 27.656

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 13 September 2010
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.1 billion / sec
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 106 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	6656 vs 4923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.876 vs 14.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	322.556 vs 302.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.478 vs 0.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.22 vs 14.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.423 vs 27.656

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

2.1x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 730 MHz
2x more memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1323 vs 1077
Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 209
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 2032
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 2920
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 3215
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 2032
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 2920
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 3215

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1566 MHz vs 730 MHz
Memory clock speed	1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1323 vs 1077
PassMark - G2D Mark	303 vs 209
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2160 vs 2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3365 vs 2920
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3325 vs 3215
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2160 vs 2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3365 vs 2920
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3325 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1077

1323

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

209

303

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6656

4923

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18.876

14.758

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

322.556

302.509

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.478

0.965

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

32.22

14.925

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

70.423

27.656

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2032

2160

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2920

3365

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

3325

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2032

2160

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2920

3365

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

3325

Name	AMD Radeon 625	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark	1077	1323
PassMark - G2D Mark	209	303
Geekbench - OpenCL	6656	4923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.876	14.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	322.556	302.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.478	0.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.22	14.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.423	27.656
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2032	2160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2920	3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3215	3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2032	2160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2920	3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3215	3325
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 625	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi
Code name	Polaris 24	GF106
Launch date	13 May 2019	13 September 2010
Place in performance rating	1134	1137
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$129
Price now		$64.99
Value for money (0-100)		26.46
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	1566 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	192
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	25.1 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	106 Watt
CUDA cores		192
Floating-point performance		601.3 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		100 °C
Transistor count		1,170 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	6-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length		8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s	57.7 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)	1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI