AMD Radeon 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 M470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and AMD Radeon R9 M470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 812.1x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 1804
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 1674
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 1674 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 5.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 8605
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 217
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2331 vs 1435
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 vs 8605 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 217 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2331 vs 1435 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M470
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | AMD Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 1674 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8605 | 47924 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 307 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1435 | 2331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | Strato |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 760 | 761 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
AMDRadeon 630 vs
AMDRadeon E8950
AMDRadeon 630 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
