AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3677.4x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 10.6 billion / sec
- 3.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 144
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3274
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3274
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 203
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1269 vs 811
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 10.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 144 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3350 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 vs 203 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1269 vs 811 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12379 vs 9651
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12379 vs 9651 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 12379 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 203 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1269 | 811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | GF106 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 759 | 867 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 10.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
| Floating-point performance | 339.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
