AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 660M and AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 660M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 14250x more texture fill rate: 45.60 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 11.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13432 vs 1203
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 23 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 45.60 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13432 vs 1203 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 660M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 660M | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13432 | 1203 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 271 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 660M | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Rembrandt | Kalindi |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 23 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1349 | 1351 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1459 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Pixel fill rate | 30.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 45.60 GTexel/s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13100 million | 1,178 million |
| Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | |


